Saturday, October 08, 2011

Orchestra Hall On A Thursday Morning

On Thursday morning, Joshua and I sneaked out of our respective offices for an early and long lunch. We met at Orchestra Hall to hear the 11:00 a.m. concert by the Minnesota Orchestra.

Music Director Osmo Vanska was conductor, and pianist Simone Dinnerstein was soloist. On the program was music by Darius Milhaud, Maurice Ravel and Richard Strauss.

Milhaud’s “La Creation Du Monde” opened the concert. When he wrote this ballet score in 1922 and 1923, Milhaud thought he was writing jazz—but an American listener would never categorize “La Creation Du Monde” as jazz. It is 1920s French music through and through, insouciant and Neo-Classical, with a few jazz-like harmonies and rhythms weakly incorporated into the composition.

Before composing “La Creation Du Monde”, Milhaud had written an earlier ballet score, “Le Boeuf Sur Le Toit”, inspired by the popular music of Brazil. “Le Boeuf Sur Le Toit”, written in 1919, is much more successful in evoking the sounds of Brazil than is “La Creation Du Monde” in evoking the sounds of American jazz.

I have never believed “La Creation Du Monde” to be a successful composition. The basic materials are thin, the development cursory, the themes pedestrian. Passing incident is lacking. “La Creation Du Monde” does not work on any level and, to my ears, it lacks even an attractive surface sheen.

As a dance work for the theater, “La Creation Du Monde” disappeared instantly from the stage. To the extent it lives on, it lives on only in the concert hall—and performances in the U.S. are few and far between, probably because Americans do not perceive the piece as very jazz-like.

The Minnesota Orchestra performance was basically a throwaway performance. The performance had obviously been fully rehearsed, but there was nothing Vanska or the musicians could do to bring the piece to life.

The Piano Concerto of Ravel followed the Milhaud.

The orchestra played with tremendous accuracy and some brilliance in the Ravel, although the rhythms were a little stiff, especially in the outer movements. Blame for the rhythmic stiffness must be laid at the feet of Vanska—rhythmic stiffness is one of his most conspicuous and ever-present shortcomings.

The Minnesota Orchestra is not a “French” orchestra, and Vanska is not a “French” conductor, so there was very little French quality to the performance. In fact, the performance was as much Russian as French, always in search of color, boldness and the big gesture instead of fragrance, understatement and “chic”. That Ravel based much of the first movement of his Piano Concerto on Stravinsky’s “Petrouchka”—his was an act of grand larceny—only further emphasized the Russian quality of Thursday morning’s performance.

Dinnerstein’s playing was charming in the slow movement, and she held my full attention there. Such is an accomplishment, because the slow movement in the Ravel is notoriously difficult to bring off. Ravel worked on his Piano Concerto for three years (1929 to 1931) and it was the slow movement that caused him grief. Ravel wanted the slow movement to be effortless—and, after much toil, the composer succeeded in making it so, but often at the expense of ennui during performance.

In the outer movements, Dinnerstein had the notes down, but she did not do much with the movements compared to the leading exponents of this concerto past and present. In the first and third movements, Dinnerstein was proficient, not arresting.

I have no clue whether Dinnerstein is an important artist. I had never previously heard her, and the Ravel Piano Concerto—unless one is a Michelangeli—reveals very little about the pianist.

After intermission, the orchestra played Strauss’s “Ein Heldenleben”.

The performance was very, very fine; the level of ensemble was very, very high. The Minnesota Orchestra may now be America’s fourth-finest ensemble, trailing—in order—only Cleveland, Chicago and Philadelphia.

The Minnesota Orchestra of today is an exceptionally-fine orchestra. When playing for Vanska, the musicians play with tremendous focus, energy and commitment. There is a vibrancy in the music-making that is not present in Boston or New York.

The orchestra has not, however, acquired greatness. Its sound remains generic as does its music-making.

The orchestra’s strings lack color and weight as well as a uniform quality of sound throughout the dynamic range. When playing at high volume, the strings lack transparency and become strident and glassy. When playing softly, the strings produce a wispy sound.

The principal winds are not a distinguished group, lacking character and personality. They do not compare favorably to the principal winds in Cleveland, Chicago and Philadelphia.

The orchestra’s brass section is very strong—but it is often allowed to overwhelm the rest of the orchestra.

The generic nature of the orchestra’s music-making was exemplified by the “Heldenleben” performance: phrasing was generalized; musical episodes were broad, not pointed and precise. Of subtle characterization there was none. It was a bold but ultimately bland “Heldenleben” that Vanska and the musicians offered. The piece was played purely as showpiece for orchestra.

And yet the performance was enormously enjoyable. Any music-lover would be happy to hear such a performance—but would be aware, the entire performance, that Fritz Reiner and Rudolf Kempe found much more content in the score than Vanska uncovered.

There was a large and enthusiastic crowd in the hall Thursday morning. I would estimate that eighty per cent of the seats were filled (Orchestra Hall accommodates 2500 persons). Free coffee and donuts were available for concertgoers. There was almost a festive air about the occasion.

It was on Wednesday night that we first discussed attending Thursday morning’s concert. When Josh mentioned this fact Wednesday night on his Twitter account, the Minnesota Orchestra replied to him—twice.

We thought that was a nice touch.

My mother came downtown for Thursday morning’s concert, too. After the concert, Josh and I took her out for a quick lunch. We went to a modest place and ordered club sandwiches.

16 comments:

  1. How cool! Thanks for such a thoughtful review, Drew. I can almost hear how this concert went just reading. I guess the Minnesota Orch is in the same phrase as the San Diego Symph -- technically ready, but no sound identity/personality yet.

    It's really cool that the Minn Orch is so responsive on twitter, too. It gives good vibes! :oD

    ReplyDelete
  2. If you want a good laugh, read Fred Kirshnit's "review" of the Bruckner 8th at Lincoln Center, on MusicalCriticism.com. His music history scholarship is equally astounding.

    I don't think Mr. Kirshnit would agree with your orchestra pecking order.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I had not seen the review you referenced until now. I do not read that website.

    Well . . . I see that Kirshnit is maintaining the same high standard he observed at concertonet.

    At least the man is consistent—he is a CONSISTENT IDIOT.

    You don’t suppose Kirshnit is paid to write such gibberish, do you? I assume his current forum, like his old forum, concertonet, involves no remuneration.

    It is alarming to think anyone might pay him to write such rubbish.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I cannot even imagine anyone as stupid as Kirshnit. That's why I suspect he is a conscious "truth demolishionist." Whatever the case, he gets my vote as the greatest among your "Conspicuous American Idiots" label.

    I recall a comment by Malcolm Muggeridge, who lamented the panorama of comparable rubbish to be found in published books. He pointed out that acid=free paper had a life expectancy of "only" 500 years or so; then he added, "Alas, microfiche has denied us such deliverance."

    Muggeridge is fortunate to have died before the age of bloggers.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have bad news for you: there are people out there even more idiotic than Kirshnit.

    Look at this choice specimen: www.davidnice.blogspot.com.

    You will note today’s breathtaking entry, a startling exposure of ignorance on the subject of Bruckner’s Fifth.

    Further, if you scroll through the first two pages of this moron’s blog, you will get a lifetime’s dosage of anti-Semitic ranting.

    What is America’s “intractable” Israel problem? And what is wrong with Americans donating funds to the Israel Philharmonic? This David Nice moron is absolutely vile.

    ReplyDelete
  6. In what specific ways, one should ask the not-so-Nice blogger, is Israel NOT a "beacon of democracy in the Middle East"?

    In what ways was Troy Davis an "innocent man" at the time of his execution?

    This is one of the worst writers purporting to be a professional that I've ever encountered. A hateful, degenerate mind this is.

    Hmm, is there some psychological link between moral degeneracy and such subobtuse thinking regarding the music of Bruckner?

    ReplyDelete
  7. There certainly IS a nexus between moral degeneracy and hatred of the Jews.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "A hateful, degenerate mind this is."

    I could not have said it better.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Wow. You guys weren't kidding. 'Nice' is a serious misnomer indeed. :o( Dude thinks way too much of himself...

    ReplyDelete
  10. Smorg, it is the blatant anti-Semitism expressed on that guy’s blog that offends me. He does not even try to conceal his anti-Semitism. I have been reading his blog, on and off, for a couple of years, and anti-Semitism is a recurrent theme. Five or six times a year, he will get on his anti-Semitic soapbox and rip away.

    As a Presbyterian, I am offended. I cannot imagine what a person of the Jewish faith might think when reading such claptrap.

    My sister-in-law spent the first 26 years of her life in London and Cambridge. She says there was virtually no anti-Semitism in Britain until the mid-1990s, when it erupted out of nowhere. Since then, it has become very, very ugly.

    (At bottom, my sister-in-law blames Tony Blair and Blair’s wife, but that is a complicated and tendentious issue.)

    ReplyDelete
  11. By the way, Smorg ...

    We have been listening to Kasarova's recording of "Werther".

    Her Charlotte is magnificent.

    ReplyDelete
  12. You are quite wrong about Milhaud's "Creation." It is not correct to view the piece as failed jazz or inadequate jazz. Mihaud studied jazz, but he composing Milhaud rather than jazz. The piece was one of Leonard Bernstein's favorites, and it has its influence on American composing. As to the ballet, the original choreography disappeared because of the collapse of the Ballet Suedois and because the choreographer was hounded by jealous and homophobis opponents of the Ballet Suedois's founder. "Creation" has been choreographed by Ninette de Valois, Alvin Ailey, Todd Bolender, and Paul Taylor, among others.

    ReplyDelete
  13. You are quite wrong about Milhaud's "Creation." It is not correct to view the piece as failed jazz or inadequate jazz. Mihaud studied jazz, but he composing Milhaud rather than jazz. The piece was one of Leonard Bernstein's favorites, and it has its influence on American composing. As to the ballet, the original choreography disappeared because of the collapse of the Ballet Suedois and because the choreographer was hounded by jealous and homophobic opponents of the Ballet Suedois's founder. "Creation" has been choreographed by Ninette de Valois, Alvin Ailey, Todd Bolender, and Paul Taylor, among others.

    ReplyDelete
  14. As I wrote: “It is 1920s French music through and through, insouciant and Neo-Classical, with a few jazz-like harmonies and rhythms weakly incorporated into the composition.”

    The piece succeeds neither as jazz nor as Milhaud. Its basic materials are weak, and it is not well-constructed. Fundamentally, “Creation” lacks the inventiveness of its predecessor ballet score.

    Bernstein made absolutely nothing of the piece in his two recordings. The 1960s Sony is tedious, and the 1980s EMI (made in France with a French orchestra) is even worse. The only decent recording of “Creation” is Weisburg on Nonesuch, who far outshines Nagano and Rattle (I suspect the Weisburg is out of print).

    None of the four choreographed versions you cite has proved lasting.

    ReplyDelete
  15. As you also said in your original post, Milhaud's Creation is not often played here "probably because Americans do not perceive the piece as very jazz-like." Part of what I meant in reply is that not being "very jazz-like" is not a fault. Also, there's no reason to think that American concert audiences would like it better if it were more jazz-like. Bernstein said that the Milhaud was one of his conceptual inspirations for "West Side Story." Ballet, as you know, rarely lasts. I mentioned these versions of it by way of saying that it did not immediately die & has been of interest to good choreographers.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I disagree with nothing you have written.

    After thirty years, the Taylor version was recently revived, was it not? Or is soon to be revived?

    I think the MacMillan version has racked up the largest number of performances.

    ReplyDelete